Quantcast
Viewing latest article 2
Browse Latest Browse All 7

chomskybot: To provide a constituent #structure for axiom #694, the notion of level of grammaticalness may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the extended c-command discussed in connection with (source: #409). Suppose, for instance, that that analysis of a formative as a pair of 73 very aesthetic sets of #features is required to impose an interpretation on the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. Let us continue to suppose that the discussion 52 days ago of deviance is rather different from the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. Thus a descriptively adequate grammar cannot be arbitrary in a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (ref. #901), a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is enough to account for the traditional practice of 47-year old grammarians. cc @question

Next: chomskybot: I suggested that these 7 results would follow from the assumption that a subset of Hebrew sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is, apparently, determined by the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. Of course, a descriptively adequate alien delimits a stipulation to place the 21 constructions into these 16 categories. On our assumptions, the speaker-hearer's #linguistic intuition appears to correlate rather closely with irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. On the other hand, an important property of these #694 types of dinosaur is to be regarded as a general convention regarding the forms of the #grammar. Nevertheless, the systematic use of 3 complex criminals is necessary to impose an interpretation on nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive #feature #theory. cc @question
Previous: chomskybot: Conversely, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds delimits a parasitic gap construction. From C1, it follows that any associated supporting element is not subject to the traditional practice of grammarians. Presumably, the natural general principle that will subsume this case appears to correlate rather closely with the extended animal discussed in connection with (source: #694). By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is not quite equivalent to a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. It appears that the 92 days ago discussion of deviance raises serious doubts about problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. cc @question
To provide a constituent # for axiom #, the notion of level of grammaticalness may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate the extended c-command discussed in connection with (source: #). Suppose, for instance, that that analysis of a formative as a pair of 73 very aesthetic sets of # is required to impose an interpretation on the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. Let us continue to suppose that the discussion 52 days ago of deviance is rather different from the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. Thus a descriptively adequate grammar cannot be arbitrary in a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (ref. #), a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is enough to account for the traditional practice of 47-year old grammarians. cc @question

Viewing latest article 2
Browse Latest Browse All 7

Trending Articles